This is something I've come to learn and profoundly understand over the past few years. I was raised believing that there was such a thing as truth. I have a pen, I know it's a pen, therefore the truth is: it's a pen. I'm doing well in school, my report card says I've earned an A or B, my teachers say that I'm excelling, so, the truth is: I'm smart. I could go on and on here, there are an endless number of examples. I've come to learn, though, that that's wrong. The truth is: there's no such thing as truth.
What on earth do I mean, there's no truth? Well, there is perspective. Everyone sees things slightly differently. They see an item, witness an event, hear words, see body language, and interpret those for themselves. People weigh everything against their own history and personal experiences. We all view everything through our own filters. When we view something as true, we're actually thinking that what we perceive is what everyone should perceive. Yes, many times those around us view things similarly, or even the same. Back to my pen example, virtually everyone will look at my pen and agree that it's a pen. Though one person may view it as a "weapon", which could be used to harm someone. Is she wrong? Is she right? Is it a weapon or not? Well, the truth is, we're all right, just voicing our own perspective.
Using my school example, was I smart or not? My teachers apparently agreed, then again aren't grades more a reflection of a teacher's opinion of the student than their IQ? Most of us remember Pygmalion in the Classroom, the study by Robert Rosenthal and Lenore Jacobson. In that classic psychological study, researchers randomly divided students. Half were labeled as high achievers, and the other half labeled as poor performers. The researchers told new teachers which were poor performers and which would do well. At the end of the trial period, quite independent of past performance, students did as well as the teachers expected. So students who were previously poor performers, but that the teachers believed would do well, actually got higher grades than the ones teachers thought would do poorly. What was the truth here, were they smart or not? Was I smart or not?
Sure, there are some who say one thing, but believe another to be true. That's called "lying". For whatever reason, they've decided to publicly state one thing, while believing another. But, are those who erroneously believe something to be true, and state their truth, lying? It may not make sense to you or me, because their perspective differs from our own, yet are they telling the truth (as they see it) or lying? It's hard to tell the difference. Sure there are poker tells. I heard of a psychological study, demonstrating small facial ticks the moment someone lies. There are plenty of studies explaining how to tell if someone is lying by looking at their body language. Still, these will only work if the person is actually stating something that differs from their own truth.
There's yet another category, denial. There are those who, deep down, believe one thing, but who don't want it to be true. They can actually kid themselves into creating a truth for themselves that varies from their own beliefs. I'm guilty of this in trying to make my relationship with my ex work. Yet another category is misperception. A schizophrenic may see little blue gnomes climbing the walls. To them, that's true. They'd pass a polygraph telling the examiner, with a straight face, about the gnomes. Okay, so that's a bit extreme, still it's a valid example. Look at a picture, is the subject beautiful or not? Is it ugly or not? It all depends on your perspective.
I remember an old girlfriend of mine saying, "I hate closed minded people!". Doesn't that mean she's closed minded toward those she views as closed minded? I once asked her how she felt about the "KKK", "Nazis", "Extreme Conservatives"? She told me the answer was obvious. Sure, it was... she didn't like them. If a KKK member approached her to discuss the virtues (as they view them) of white supremacy, how long would she listen? Would she have an open mind toward them? Again, the answer was obvious.
The same goes for me, I admit to being closed minded on topics I've already made my mind up about. I am, in fact, prejudiced against those I deem prejudiced people. But I'll always remember Voltair's famous words, "I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it."
Sometimes I'm even guilty of making my mind up by virtue of my peers decisions. I remember years ago going to the Hopkins Fair, an annual fair held on the campus of Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD. Not only are their rides, food, music and crafts for sale, but there are tables of people peddling their political beliefs. I remember walking by the "pro-choice" table. I gave them a thumbs up, and signed a petition of theirs. Later, after getting a sandwich for lunch, I strolled by the "pro-life" table, and shot an ugly look their way. I sat down to eat my lunch, in full view of the "pro-life" table. As I ate, I realized, I don't really like the idea of killing fetuses. I do think children are wonderful. I also know that, with the exception of rape, women get pregnant because they willingly had sex. So, why would I be "pro-choice"? Have I simply accepted the "pro-choice" position of my peers, without exploring it for myself? Guilty as charged.
I decided to challenge my own truth, open my own mind, and genuinely see if I can determine my own position, unbiased by my peers. As I munched on my sandwich, I thought, what makes me "pro-choice"? Afterall, I'm not a fan of murder... I'm anti-death penalty. But I do support the "pro-choice" movement. Are those opposing beliefs; am I being hypocritical? Okay, I thought, I'm open to exploring both sides of this issue. But first, let me define my personal criteria. If an abortion is murder, perhaps I'd not favor it. What is the alternative to
abortion, in unwanted pregnancies? Believing that virtually everyone knows, at the moment of conception, if they wanted a child or not, what do each side offer to help people avoid getting pregnant, thus the need for abortion?
After tossing out the remains of my lunch, I walked over to the pro-life table. With an open mind, I struck up a conversation with a woman there, proudly displaying a pickled fetus. "Tell me about pro-life?" She told me that they believe abortion is murder. I asked her why she believed that abortion was murder? She said, simply, that it's ending the life of a fetus, and that's murder. I asked her if a fetus was a living being, or a developing being. Meaning, was it truly a person, or not a person yet. I asked her her position on the death penalty? She said the pro-life movement doesn't have a position on the death penalty. Okay, what is your personal position on the death penalty. Avoiding the topic, she told me that an unborn baby is an innocent life; the life of someone who's not done anything wrong. While a person on death row, has committed a horrible crime. Believing that there are many people wrongly convicted of serious crimes, I didn't pursue this any further.
Then I told her that I believe virtually everyone who gets pregnant, knew at the moment of conception if they wanted a child or not. What does pro-life feel we should do to help avoid unwanted pregnancies as much as possible? She said they believe in abstinence. That is the only way, she said, to guarantee someone doesn't get pregnant. I asked about rape, and she avoided the topic. I asked their position on sex education and birth control. She was fiercely against both. At this point, I really was confused. If they are against abortion, why wouldn't they want to avoid the decision altogether? If only those who have the means and desire to have children were getting pregnant, then we wouldn't even be having this debate, would we? Sure, that's a fantasy, still we could come much closer than we are today. I think abstinence is a fantasy too. Then again, that's my truth, not hers.
I wandered over to the pro-choice table, and told the woman there of my quest... to understand my truth. We discussed the beginning of life. She believed that a fetus is alive, but not a thinking, feeling being until later in the pregnancy. They had lots of ideas about education and contraception. She understood, and empathized with my concerns over reducing the number of unwanted pregnancies. All in all, I understood where she was coming from. In the end, I decided that I am pro-choice. And I feel comfortable in my decision, believing that I've opened my mind and truly evaluated for myself, where I stand.
Why am I discussing all this? Well, my ex and I had differing truths. In many cases, diametrically opposed truths. We disagreed on so many things. At times I thought she was lying. Other times, I thought her misperceiving or denying things. Still other times I believed she hadn't thought through her own position, or challenged her own beliefs. The most frustrating to me, was when she got mad at me for doing something that I, in my perspective, didn't do, think, say or feel. This is something that I'm continuing to explore and understand. I've come to believe that, regardless of our truths, I have to acknowledge that neither of us is wrong. We just see the world in very different ways. I don't agree with her beliefs, and that's cool. Still I do need to acknowledge that they're truths to her.
WhyCali?
In my list yesterday, I mentioned that I want to have strong, healthy relationships with friends and family. Today, I don't. I accept responsibility for this. My crime has been lack of effort, even avoidance. It's not that I don't like or want my friends. It's that I've been so down the past few years that I've feared that I'd have to fess up to them that things aren't going very well. I'd always been such an optimistic person, full of life, full of thoughts. To me, I couldn't bear to be a downer to the people I cared about the most. Part of me didn't want to be judged. Part of me didn't want to be one of those whiners, always bringing people around them down. That's not me, yet that's what I'd allowed myself to become. I couldn't deal with telling my friends. So, I coped by not calling them, and becoming incommunicado. Hell, in a sense I'd become a recluse.
that I couldn't bear to speak with anyone. What would I say, "life sucks?" I wanted to wait until things got better, until I was full of life again before speaking with them. Things never got better; I never called. Finally, I really needed someone to talk to about life. I called Dave, and he wasn't there for me... mostly because he felt hurt that I'd been avoiding him. He was pretty straight with me, that he'd felt shunned and ignored... that he really was too mad at me to chat. This happened about three years ago, I've remembered his birthday and anniversary, even his wife's birthday every year. He's remembered mine, and we've sent each other birthday wishes. Yet that's all our friendship has become. That really saddens me.
A few weeks ago, just before the holidays, an old friend of mine, Mike called. I'd fallen out of contact with him too. We worked together in Maryland, years ago, before I joined Microsoft. We used to run into each other at Microsoft conferences, and would always have a few meals and perhaps drinks together to chat. I was quickly becoming a millionaire with my Microsoft stock. While he was making a respectable salary, had no stock, and wasn't financially as sound as I was becoming. After a couple of years, he showed interest in joining me at Microsoft, I made a few phone calls and helped him get hired. He actually moved to California, in the same group within Microsoft as I. It was quite an adjustment for him too. The bad part was that Microsoft Stock had really peaked, and was headed downward. My many hundreds of thousands turned into very little. I sold a bit, but really lost it all. His stock options are all "under water" now. I know he made the decision to join Microsoft at that time, still I feel a bit guilty about having influenced his decision. Anyhow, he's a great guy. Just after my last breakup, he and his wife took me up to Napa Valley for a day trip. We went to a few tastings, ate some good food, and really had fun. I've not kept in contact with him either. Even when he called me, a few short weeks ago, I waited several days before returning his call. We agreed to get together for lunch, but then I didn't follow through on a day.
Yet, I have done a really poor job being there for mom. I haven't been calling her, or my brothers as I'd like.
Not my finest day... That's okay, I'll discuss it, but I refuse to beat myself up over it. I couldn't sleep... simply couldn't sleep. Just laid there for hours full of guilty feelings, worries and fear. All tolled, I got about 4 or 5 hours of heavily interrupted sleep. Even when I slept, the thoughts found their way into my dreams. Finally, my son woke me up around 10:am because he needed a little assistance with the papier de toilette. I was in a fog all day; couldn't focus or really pay attention to him or anything else very well.
I think the worst part of all was that I'd promised a trip to the
Boy, that list seems so simple. So why does it all feel so overwhelming to me? I guess it's like a train. While it's on the tracks, it moves along at a brisk pace. But, if it's derailed, it'll take a massive effort to clean up the mess and get the thing rolling again. I'm derailed, but have no crew of engineers to make things right.
My boss was floored, and immediately called the Vice President down to see it. I demonstrated it, and they were amazed. Honestly, I thought they were impressed with my little program. But, as it turns out, they were seeing dollar signs. Remember, the government agreed to a flat price per PC. So if we could do it quicker, we'd have a higher profit. This was beyond their wildest dreams, and translated into millions in profit. I was motivated by lazyness... it's easier to write a program than to write a manual. That simple little thing propelled me into super-stardom in my first week. I got four promotions in the four years I was there, and ended up with twice my initial salary and heading up three departments. It seemed, the more they heaped on my shoulders, the more got done. Not only that, but the staff had a lot more fun doing it. Oh, the glory days.
Rather than focus on fixing their issues, they decided it was time to discuss the possibility of Linux on the desktop. Okay, I admit, most of my background has been in the Microsoft world, but I don't work for them anymore. I don't have any Microsoft stock any longer. I have used Linux, and think that it's pretty cool. In fact, I'm hosting this blog on a Linux machine. Still, changing a company from Microsoft to Linux is a major undertaking. There is a major investment in deploying the technology, converting any applications and files necessary, training support, IT and staff. It's not a little thing, it's a big deal. Besides, it really wasn't their issue... Honestly, making a change like that would exacerbate their problems. Because of this debate, they paid me for four months of ... well, mindless meetings debating the pros and cons of Windows versus Linux. Ultimately, I suggested that the management change their laptops to Linux, and work with it for a few months. Instead of discussing it at a high level, let's run an alpha test on them. They hemmed and hawed, and finally agreed to try it. Within a week, they changed their tune, and decided to postpone the decision until they felt Linux was ready for them. Bear in mind, none of these folks were very technical. That frustrated me, I felt like I wasted months of my life on something that ultimately detracted from their real issues. Oh well.
Maybe that's what I've been doing in my life as well. I'm focusing on the wrong stuff. I need to figure out what I enjoy doing, professionally, instead of sticking with my history. Sure, I could go back into engineering and architecture, but I'm not as sharp technically as I was. If I wanted to do this, I'll need to study quite a bit and get back into technical shape. I could shoot for IT management, that is something to look into. There's training, that's always fun and pretty low stress, though not as lucrative. Maybe I could become a headhunter... not sure about that one, seems a little slimey for me. Or maybe I should think completely off the page... what about becoming a masseuse, or going back to school for psychology? Hmmmm, if I want, the world can be my Oyster again.
This week I have custody of my son. Since I'm out of work (for the time being), I took him out of daycare and am spending my days with him just enjoying being a dad. Honestly, I had been so concerned about fixing my relationship and what I'd become, that I'd forgotten how much he really needs me. I realized that even when I had him with me I wasn't taking advantage of the time. Those parents who just plunk their kids in front of the TV always bothered me. Yet I realize that I'd become one of them.
I'm not very religious, but was raised, and consider myself Jewish. Many years ago I went to a retreat for non-practicing Jews, hosted by an Orthodox Jewish group. Fundamentalists always eek me out a bit, still I'm open to listening to what they have to say. I do respect their passion.
For example, our
This always seemed sooooo very extreme and unwarranted. But the Rabbi explained that it's a way of cleansing your mind. He said during
I was watching a recent
Then I watched a recent
I watched "


